Monday, December 5, 2016

Recreating Cameras and Lights in Maya

I am running on a Core m3 processor which should be fine for maya... but maya is moody and it wants to crash and not import my image.
Therefore, I will be taking a picture of some cans... but also you moved your imagine of 6029 (for next semester you might want to be aware of that.
so I am using img_6028 because I have already wasted 2 hours playing around with this stuff.

replication with cranberry sauce
45 degrees to the left


Someone in my house ran through the room and ripped down all my lamps breaking them all right as I was going to take the first picture. I could not have any more patients with this project from top to bottom. Goodluck on winter holiday!


Monday, November 7, 2016

Stop-Motion Character Animation

In this assignment you will create a simple stop-motion animation of a moving character. For your character, use a doll or stuffed animal that's easily poseable; a clay model would also work well.

I don't have any knickknacks or dolls because I'm grown, so thanks to my little brother I had some of his favorite characters be a part of a Harlem shake dance party which quickly turned into a fight. For the most part I just put wedges to prop the bigger characters and I moved the limbs of the rest to fit a Harlem shake/fight party. The whole thing was 127 frames. You can see some fishing string I used for a few jumps. I think clay or other characters would have been much easier to manipulate, but like I said I don't keep kids things and all I have is a little brother to provide me with toys. Next time I'm buying some play-doe.

And to address the believability, please consider the characters jumping (halo dudes) and the lazy ones just rocking (pandas!), and we all know pirates breakdance.

Friday, November 4, 2016

Outline for the Third Term Paper

I will be comparing the visual effects of Surf's Up (2007) and the wave scene from the new Point Break (2015). Where I feel both films were successful in recreating the waves, granted I don't believe some of the movements the surfers did were completely honest.
  • Surf's Up
    • This wave was completely designed and developed by the creator
    • help in where the wave would naturally pinch and speed up was advised by Kelly Slater, the best surfer who has every lived.
      • Kelly has 11 world titles to say he is the best surfer
      • he has recreated one of the best artificial waves the world has seen.
    • below I have a video of one of the shots
      • they detailed everything from the lighting and refraction to the water drops and scratches on the lens.
      • the speed the camera is at is also a common speed water cinematographers film in.
  •  Point Break
    • the first Point Break movie was obviously fake, they didn't have the proper cameras to really get into surf cinematography.
      • in one scene 10 dudes come up behind Johnny Utah on a wave, which is impossible because you are given the energy and speed from the wave.
    • with the new Point Break, they had 3 of the best surfers who have surfed Teahupoo which is the location in Tahiti that they filmed at.
      • even with some of the best surfers to get footage of the spot I don't believe 2 people would take off on the same wave.
      • the reef at Teahupoo is roughly 1/3 the height of the wave below the water.
        • so at 20 feet there is only 6 maybe 7 feet of water
        • I have seen so many professional come out of the water with holes in their bodies from hitting the reef.
    • below the first video is the movie, the second video is the scariest thing I have seen in my life, real footage from a huge day a few years ago at Teahupoo (turn up the volume and feel small).
  •  Conclusion
    • using professionals from the industry can give you the best results for a film.
    • even somethings that seem impossible can be real, like the wave at Teahupoo.
    • any of the waves in these videos will kill a normal person who is not an expert in the ocean, given how shallow the reef is to give the lip of the waves.
    • However, both films were successful given the teams they assembled to recreate the surfer's success.

Friday, October 28, 2016

Science Fact or Cinematic Fiction?

     Psychological Priming is a survival technic humans use daily, its a way of setting our mind to the exposure of one stimulus so that we can better respond to other stimulus. Hollywood has played on this survival technic, when we walk into the theater, we are not priming for accurate physical principals, we are primed to be entertained. Even if you were a hero and a writer reproduced your story, you will be made a legend from the making of that movie, because reality is harsh and boring, super powers are more fun (and highly inaccurate). However, an important component of being an educated adult is the ability to differentiate fact from fiction, even if you like to indulge fiction. I will be exposing violations in Newton's Third Law of Motion from Django Unchained, The Simpsons, and Monty Python's the Holy Grail. Showing that for every action there is an equal and opposite re-action, the equal and opposite re-action will be my focus. Seeing how some of our favorite effects revolve around what should be a relatively small force being distorted and ignored to apply an astronomical force to make a hero.
    For my first example, I will use my favorite writer/director Quentin Jerome Tarantino, the universe that he writes in is so thoughtful and relative. As he offers countless movies where every reaction is not properly represented by the original action, I have decided to focus on Django Unchained (2012). In the movie a German bounty hunter helps a freed slave rescue his wife from a brutal Mississippi plantation owner. In the first clip Dr. Schultz is blown away (0:46) by the force of the double-barrel 12 gauge shot gun. Where this force is the same on the shoulder of the shooter as it is in Dr. Schultz chest. What we should expect is the consistency of the watermelons in FPS Russians YouTube video (below), FPS has a lot of other effects due to the chemicals he introduced inside of the melons to create a fire. Also, we can pay attention to the back fence and compare it to the book shelf explosion. The book shelf implied that the shotgun was a "sawed off shotgun" given that the spread of the bullets incorporated such a large area in such close quarters. This actually takes force away from what should have happened to poor Dr. Schultz, with less accelerated mass hitting him, he probably should have just fallen onto his face rather then being lunched backwards. Instead Quentin made Dr. Schultz looking like an acetylene barrel. However, fallowing this second shot, all other shots were fairly accurate given the rounds of the guns.


     For my second example, lets take a completely different type of entertainment that distorts Newton's Third Law. Lets look at an episode of The Simpsons created by James Brooks, Matt Groening and Sam Simon. In this episode they do a spoof on Lord of the Rings which involves a major fight scene where a castle is to be raided by the American Shipping Service because Bart unlawfully got free boxes from them, and they want them back. As soon as I started looking through the episode, it is riddled with incorrect outcomes given the recipes to each scene. I am avoiding all other inaccuracies and focusing on (3:39) Bart put a square brick in a round cardboard tube. Clearly the fit is not air tight, if the pressure was enough to blow the brick the strength of the cardboard would not be enough. The brick lands and hits a American Shipping Serviceman in the chest and he is forced to the ground given the impact. From that we have to make two assumptions to enjoy the show. First, that Bart can blow a brick with a breadth of air. Second, that Bart's one breadth of air can knock a man over with an exponential force. These two assumptions clearly break the 3rd law, because a 160lb man can not be blown over by a boy, where a man's lung capacity is 6 Liters, so Bart might have 2.5 L given his ration to Homer. The effect of a grown man (6 liters of air) blowing on a candle can be shown by Jack Black in the video below, at a much farther distance Bart's effect would be even less then that of Jack Black's.


    My third and final example comes from the classic Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) written by Graham Chapman. If you have ever seen the movie you will know that, its such a ridiculous movie, although I find it extremely hilarious. As the king of the Brits goes around asking for direction to find the Holy Grail, he comes across a castle filled with Frenchmen in England. When asked why the Frenchmen are in Britain, the Brits are quickly told to mind their own business and that is where the Brits are unwelcomed. As the Frenchmen provokes them, he ends up throwing a Cow over the wall. Not just from the height of the wall but it is launched hundreds of feet in the air. Other cows and farm yard animals are thrown from the walls of the castle, one lands on one of the knights and the knight gets up and runs away. If the forces from the cow coming off the wall was applied to a human they would be smashed. In other words the man should be just as dead as the cow at the end of the scene given that Newton's Third Law stands correct. Actually, he should be more smashed then the cow given their masses.


     To conclude, we are primed to be entertained when we start a movie or a TV show, and with that we are ready to accept the fiction that comes along with it. Heroes aren't enough for a story line, what we want to see are legends and the writer will make legends, no matter how inaccurate super powers are. Nonetheless, an important element of being a well-educated adult is the ability to differentiate fact from fiction. I was able to show the violations in Newton's Third Law of Motion from Django Unchained, The Simpsons, and Monty Python's the Holy Grail. Showing that for every action there is an equal and opposite re-action that is broken. Quite simply if real life was accurately reproduced by the media, no one would feel the need to partake in the entertainment industry, because it wouldn't be any different from the monotonous agenda many people live. Entertainment needs to break the intuitive laws our universe gives. Breaking these laws gives us a false sense of freedom, in which we all love to dream.

Monday, October 24, 2016

Outline for the Second Term Paper


Introduction

Thesis: I will be exposing violations in Newton's Third Law of Motion from Django Unchained, the Simpsons, and Monty Python the Holy Grail. Showing that for every action there is an equal and opposite re-action, the equal and opposite re-action will be my focus.

Body Paragraphs

1. Django Unchained: Double-barrel 12 gauge shotgun on Dr. Schultz
  • In the first clip Dr. Schultz is blown away (0:46) the force of the double-barrel 12 gauge shot gun is the same on the shoulder of the shooter as it is in Dr. Schultz chest.
  • What we should expect is the consistency of the watermelons in FPS Russians youtube video plus a lot of other effects given a change in chemistry.
    • the back fence did not go up like the book shelf explosion.
    • instead of Dr. Schultz looking like an acetylene barrel.
  • all other shots were fairly accurate given the rounds of the guns.

2. Simpsons Lord of the Rings spoof
  • avoiding all other inaccuracies and focusing on (3:39) in the clip shows Bart putting a square brick in a round cardboard tube. Clearly the fit is not air tight.
  • the brick land and hits a American Shipping Serviceman in the chest and is forced to the ground.
    • we have to make 2 assumptions to enjoy the show
      • 1. Bart can blow a brick with a breadth of air.
      • 2. Bart's breadth of air can knock a man over.
    • These clearly break the 3rd law, because a 160lb man can not be blown over by a boy (where a mans lung capacity is 6 Liters, so Bart might have 2.5 given his ration to Homer).
  • the effect of a grown man (6 liters of air) blowing on a candle can be shown by Jack Black in the next video, the effect Bart would have at a much farther distance would be even less.


3. Monty Python and the Holy Grail
  • As the king of the Brits goes around asking for direction on the Holy Grail, he comes across a castle filled with Frenchmen in England.
  • As the Frenchmen provokes them, he ends up throwing a Cow over the wall.
  • There are cows and other farm yard animals thrown from the walls of the castle, one lands on one of the knights and the knight gets up and runs away.
  • if the forces from the cow coming off the wall was applied to a human they would be smashed.
  • the man would be just as dead as the cow.


Conclusion
  • Physical laws are intentionally broken throughout the film whenever more dramatization is wanted.
  • the Third law states for every action there is an equal and opposite re-action, the equal and opposite re-action while these three examples show the Director alters this law for effect.




Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Reverse Video Reference


A whole day went into this, in a freezing cold pool in santa cruz, the movements and camera work was studied carefully and many takes were... taken. But these are the best and well, they are hilarious so don't doc me points. I am not a professional Choreographer, nor is my friend a professional Cinematographer... have mercy.  

Clip A
Clip B
Clip C
Clip D

Monday, October 10, 2016

Stop Motion Animation of falling


Well first of all, I couldn't think of anything to do, so I found a superman lego and then thought of ideas. He is supposed to fly right? so it would be funny if he couldn't fly nor swim. So he is having nightmares about drowning, he sets out to face his fears. He drowns. As you can see form the pictures I added, my hands were in a lot of shots in which I didn't use or I cropped my hands out of them. Superman's projectile motion off the cliff was that as a humans, very little x-axis velocity lead to a very small change in X at the bottom. I will not treat his cape as a tracking suit skydivers use to catch lift, because squirrel suits are awesome, capes are for losers. I then just raise my hand out of the frame and dropped him, letting you believe he jumped on his own. I started the frames as he was close to his jumping point.



Monday, October 3, 2016

The Laws of Physics in an Animation Universe: Zootopia


Introduction
In the animated Feature Film Zootopia, the modern society of anthropomorphic animals, showed physics to be unnatural and manipulated when convenient, the product is a fun world to watch. I will cover the critical analysis of animation and special effects this fun world portrayed. Outside of physics, I really appreciated the film for its morals and message. It related to the real world we find ourselves in, the animals in Zootopia are split into two groups: prey and predators. The prey makes up the majority of the populous, while the predators are in the minority. The assistant mayor (a sheep) creates a scandal in which the predators are poisoned to go savage and revert to their former ways of living before the modern society began. A wide-eyed bunny named Judy found herself to be the one to revel this new event by doing her job as a police officer and protecting the animals, but she was also the one who reunited the city with the help of her friend Nick who is a fox. The plot is so great that I had to watch the movie a second time to pick up on the animations. In which, this world is defiant to physics in the subtlest ways by: braking the laws of gravity, exaggerating the paths of action and exaggerating inertia.

Body Paragraphs
1. Laws of Gravity Broken
The film starts with Judy in a school play which is themed on the history of the animal instinct and the future anthropomorphic animals have to look forward to. Because she is a bunny she was discouraged by people when she said she wanted to be a police officer. After the play she had a run in with the bully Gideon a fox, while he was picking on a few prey animals. She stood her ground against him and in doing so things became physical and he pushed her to the ground (Fig 1). Now regarding physics, gravity is broken as Gideon pushes Judy, and she goes up before she goes in the direction of the push (4:52). Her body is small, but on the push her feet come all the way up to where her head was, Gideon was much taller than her, so the angle he pushed should have directed even more extremely toward the ground. My Second example of gravity being broken is when Judy and Nick are running away from Manches the Jaguar after he is poisoned with the Night howler flower to go savage, they ran from him and crossed a bridge (52:00). As Manches entered the bridge the two smaller creatures where launched into the air as if the jaguar was a 1000 times their size, Manches mass simply is not capable of the height Judy and Nick reached unless gravity is not 9.8m/s (in which it is not consistent throughout the movie). The third example gravity is broken is when the weasel that steals the night howlers from the store clerk, is running from Judy and he finds himself on the top of a train going through the little animal town. He finds himself having to change his shape to fit through the mouse tunnel forms that are attaching buildings over the train tracks. This indifference to physics adds humor, and with him staying in pace with his X-directional movement, his Y-direction is granted unlimited hang time where the rule of 4th down at half is not followed (30:06).
Fig 1: Judy being pushed by Gideon


2. Exaggerated Paths of Action
Here I will address the exaggerated paths of action some of our characters find themselves in. My first example, Nick and Judy are talking, Nick points away and when Judy looks and looks back to Nick, Nick has moved a whole block within 4 seconds (Fig 2), as it snaps back to Nick, he is casually strolling around the corner (23:56). The second time I found an exaggerated path of action is, as our two heroes are running away from the savage Manches and they find themselves doing some extreme rope swinging. Nick flies up in the air after dismounting from Judy’s hand and given his extended rotation radius he should have more momentum to go higher than Judy. We should see she Judy follow with a smaller but identical parabolic movement, but instead we see Judy then climax higher and later then Nick (55:15). Thirdly, once again we revisit the weasel that stole the Night howlers, in the chase he is approaching the little animal town, which is fenced off. The projectile motion the weasel’s bag makes is inaccurate, he is running full speed far away from the fence and he tosses the bag in the air with a high velocity in the X-direction, the bag lands directly on the other side of the fence with hardly any change in ∆X (29:06).
Fig 2: Nick disappearing a full block in less than 4 seconds.


3. Inertia exaggerations
My final group of example of this film being indifferent to the laws of physics will be the exaggerations of Inertia. In my first example the neighbors next door to Judy are two bucks from the savanna, they both have a harsh but sweet side to them. In this example they are being terrible unapologetic neighbors, who as they argue on the other side of the wall, their voices are being animated by two picture frames in Judy’s room (Fig 3).  When they talk, their assigned picture frame moves to their words (27:50). Given the law of inertia, this is possible give the sound waves are big enough. However, I have never seen the pictures on my wall move to the voice of my neighbors. The second example of Inertia being exaggerated is as Judy is training to be a police officer, she is up against a rhino in a boxing match. Let’s say a bunny rabbit weighs 5 lbs, and a rhino’s arm weighs 150lbs (these are not exact figures, just numbers to prove a concept). Judy jumps off the boxing ring rope to fly into the fist of the Rhino, she is much smaller than, the rhino's fist moves with more speed than Judy entered the engagement with (7:08). Consequently, the rhino is knocked out with his own fist, the kinetic energy through the series of events exponentially grew in which breaks the laws of inertia. Thirdly, Nick and Judy break the rules of inertia by taking their runaway train filled with evidence to inform the public and bring to justice the scandal at hand. Nick and Judy jump off the train going full speed and they stop where they land, as the train goes into the wall (127:40). In which we know an object in motion stays in motion until acted upon, in which we did not see them catch friction as they slowed to a stop after impact.
Fig 3: The pictures are moving with the voices of the neighbors


Conclusion
             To conclude, Zootopia is indifferent to physical laws as they intentionally broke them throughout the film whenever more flare was wanted. If I wasn't paying attention I would not notice the laws broken in physics, because it gives the film more life, and adds comedy in which I am so focused on being entertained. Given this assignment I was able to base my observations on modern science in theoretical analysis and principles of experimental observations. In the subtlest ways this world of clothed animals is defiant to physics by braking the laws of gravity, exaggerating the paths of action and exaggerating inertia. In all the examples I mentioned above we can agree, sometimes breaking the rules makes things a little more fun, I would have hated to see Nick and Judy break all their bones when they made their exit from the train. The film would have made an ending there or else threaten to break the rules of biology, or more practically cut to a black screen that says “1 years later and 6 surgeries each they are back” to pick up the tragedy that should have happened if the laws of physics were not then broken. However, this was not a film on reality, it was a film that wants you to assimilate with people who are different from you, and with that I am alright with the broken physics.

***The outline has been revised given Chris' Comments

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Term Paper Outline: Zootopia Analysis

Revised

Introduction

A. Animated Feature Film:  Zootopia (108 min)
B. Thesis- In a city of anthropomorphic animals, physics are unnatural and manipulated when convenient, the product is a fun world to watch.

Body Paragraphs

1. Laws of Gravity Broken
-Judy and Nick are running away from Manches the bridge throws both Nick and Judy in the air much farther then what Manches mass is capable of (52:00)
-Gideon pushes Judy, and she goes up before she goes in the direction of the push (4:52)
-the weasel changes his shape to fit through the mouse tunnel forms, with that his hang time is unlimited (30:06)

2. Exaggerated Paths of Action
-Nick points away and when Judy looks and looks back to Nick, Nick has moved a whole block (23:56)
-As Nick flies up in the air after dismounting from Judy, Judy then climaxes higher and later then Nick (55:15)
-the projectile motion the weasel makes is inaccurate, he is running full speed far away from the fence and he tosses the bag in the air with a high velocity in the x direction, the bag lands directly on the other side of the fence with hardly any change in X (29:06)

3. Inertia exaggerations
-the neighbors next door to Judy, are talking through the wall and when they talk, an assigned picture frame moves to their words (27:50)
-Judy jumps off the boxing ring rope to fly into the fist of the Rhino, she is much smaller then then the rhinos fist and the rhino's fist moves with more speed than Judy (7:08).
-Nick and Judy jump off the train going full speed and they stop where they land, as the train goes into the wall (127:40)


Conclusion
-Physical laws are intentionally broken throughout the film whenever more flare was wanted.
-If I wasn't paying attention I would not notice the laws broken in physics, it gives the film more life, and adds comedy.

Term Paper Outline: Zootopia Analysis


Introduction

A. Animated Feature Film:  Zootopia (108 min)
B. Thesis- In a city of anthropomorphic animals, physics is pushed beyond the limits of the natural world, the product is a humorous universe.

Body Paragraphs

1. Exaggerated Character Movements
-Judy does a backflip and moves far away from the direction she started in (3:41)
-Gideon pushes Judy, and she goes up before she goes in the direction of the push (4:52)
-Judy jumps off the boxing ring rope to fly into the fist of the Rhino, she is much smaller then then the rhinos fist and the rhino's fist moves with more speed than Judy (7:08).
-Judy does a lot of bouncing around that is not legitimate (17:20)
-elephants make quick movements that aren't real (19:55)
-Judy's mom goes to end the facetime call and the frame ends with her finger being in the middle of the display screen, implying the camera is in the bottom third of the phone (27:32)
-the projectile motion the weasel makes is inaccurate, he is running full speed far away from the fence and he tosses the bag in the air with a high velocity in the x direction, the bag lands directly on the other side of the fence with hardly any change in X (29:06)

2. Slowed/altered key spacing
-Judy is riding the train into Zootopia and they cut through the trees to view the train, and given the speed of the frames, the train is going very slow, because it needs to for the effect (10:09-12:00)
-Nick points and when the frame comes back he has moved a whole block (23:56)
-the weasel changes his shape to fit through the mouse tunnel forms (30:06)

3. Animals make inanimate objects shake
­-Judy almost gets smashed by a rhino walking on the street, and as he walks the ground shakes (25:16)
-the neighbors next door to Judy, are talking through the wall and when they talk a picture frame that has been assigned to each character moves in rhythm to their words (27:50)


Conclusion
-Physical laws are intentionally broken throughout the film.
-If I wasn't paying attention I would not notice the laws broken in physics, it gives the film more life, and add comedy and a sense of danger to normal everyday actions.

Friday, September 2, 2016

Mini-Portfolio

Swimming with a ton of fish off Holbox in Mexico.
I am a little fish in a big ocean down in Mexico 
at home north of Santa Cruz
 
Describing myself is often difficult because sometimes I feel like everything is a lie, but if you want to see more lies check out my Instagram @Black_Fin. I post pictures of the beautiful people I get to spend life with, some of the glimpses of magic I see along the way, and occasionally pictures my friends take of me. or we can be friends on The Book 
My name is Jacob Sanchez, I go by Jacob/Jax/Sancho depending on what friend group you know me from. I am not an artist, however I would consider myself a creative, but my mediums often involve food, apple wine, gardening, wood work, welding, just random projects that attract my attention. And to be clear, I have never taken an art class, I didn't know this was an art class, I figured it would just be more theory, so I am excited.  
 
At the university I study Chemistry the classes I an enrolled in this semester are:
The Chemistry of Wine
Physical Chemistry
Chemistry and the computer
a Seminar for Graduate School
Waves and Optics
Physics of Animation
Scuba diving
and I am apart of an Analytical Research group on campus
 
After my Bachelors degree I plan on going on for a PhD, and past that I plan on being involved with start ups, politics, and generally a philosophical world leader. However, if I end up on a sailboat in the south pacific with a beautiful wife and kids, I would hardly see it as a failure.

Thursday, August 25, 2016